Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The substantive case reached the Upper Tribunal by way of a mandatory transfer from the Administrative Court under section 31A of the Senior Courts Act 1981 (see below).� On 21 May 2012 Judge Ward held a rolled-up hearing and on 21 June 2012 gave a decision ( [2012] UKUT 213 (AAC) ) granting the application for judicial review.�
We begin by examining the Upper Tribunal�s judicial review jurisdiction and comparing it with that in respect of statutory appeals.� We then look at the costs regimes� respectively applicable in the Upper Tribunal, First-tier Tribunal and Administrative Court.� We remind ourselves of the overriding objective and of work already done in this field by the Costs Review Group established by the previous Senior President of Tribunals, before turning to the submissions made to us.
�(1) The Upper Tribunal has power, in cases arising under the law of England and Wales � to grant the following kinds of relief�
(b) the tribunal is authorised to proceed even though not all of those conditions are met (see section 19(3) and (4)).
(a) has the same effect as the corresponding relief granted by the High Court on an application for judicial review, and
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.