Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
We have considered whether any parties require the protection of an anonymity direction. No anonymity direction was made previously in respect of this Appellant. Having considered all the circumstances and evidence we do not consider it necessary to make an anonymity direction.
The Secretary of State for the Home Department brings this appeal but in order to avoid confusion the parties are referred to as they were in the First-tier Tribunal. This is an appeal by the Secretary of State against a decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Bradshaw, promulgated on 9 November 2016 which allowed the Appellant's appeal.
The appellant came to the UK on 7 February 2009 as a tier 4 student. Although the respondent extended leave to remain as a tier 4 student that leave was curtailed on 14 August 2013 so that it expired on 3 January 2014. On 20 May 2013 the appellant applied for a residence card as a derivative right to reside in the UK. That application was refused on 25 October 2014.
On 25 November 2014 the appellant applied for a residence card as confirmation of her derivative right to reside in the UK as the primary carer of her British citizen mother. That application was refused on 19 January 2015.
The Appellant appealed to the First-tier Tribunal. First-tier Tribunal Judge Bradshaw ("the Judge") allowed the appeal against the Respondent's decision.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.