Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This is an appeal to the Upper Tribunal, with permission, by the Appellant with regard to a determination of the First-tier Tribunal (Judge Boyd) promulgated on 1 st October 2014 by which he dismissed the Appellant�s appeal against the Secretary of State�s decision to refuse him leave to remain in the UK as a Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) Migrant.
The grounds on which permission to appeal was granted by a First-tier Tribunal Judge argue that the Judge erred in taking irrelevant factors into account, in particular that the Sponsor�s account was opened a month before the application was made when all the Appellant had to show was that he had access to the money at the date of application.
Secondly, the grounds argue that the fact that the Appellant�s company was bought �off the shelf� was immaterial to its being a genuine company. Thirdly, it is argued that the Judge erred in finding that the Appellant did not have a web site when there was evidence that he did and fourthly it is argued that it was irrelevant to the appeal whether the Appellant had previous experience which, in fact, he did have.
In any event the Judge found, as he was entitled to, that the only contract that the Appellant produced was not a reliable document.
The evidence before the First-tier Tribunal Judge regarding the Appellant�s website all post dates the date of application.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.