Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL 58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS At the Tribunal On 22 November 2001 Before
They then proceed to set out the facts of the case at paragraph 3 onwards. They direct themselves as to the law. That
The judgment then goes on to say that Section 98(2) lists four potentially fair reasons for dismissal. It then in its conclusions states as follows at paragraph 7
We have had the benefit of a skeleton argument. It is right to say that the chairman was asked about the suggestion that the Applicant's cross examination was not permitted and he said this
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.