Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Harry Langford (instructed by Hanne & Co LLP) for the Applicant Elle Tait (instructed by Miles & Partners) for the Respondent Hearing dates: 13th May 2025 ____________________
i) As a first step the court should consider whether the assertions are of such a nature, and of sufficient detail and substance, that they could constitute a grave risk;
ii) If it proceeds to the second step, the court determines whether it is satisfied the grave risk exception to the child's return has been established by examining and evaluating the evidence presented by the person opposing the child's return, and by taking into account the evidence pertaining to protective measures available in the state of habitual residence.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.