Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
LORD JUSTICE MAURICE KAY LORD JUSTICE LLOYD and LORD JUSTICE SULLIVAN ____________________
( DAR Transcript of WordWave International Limited A Merrill Communications Company 165 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2DY Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838 Official Shorthand Writers to the Court )
Ms Nwamaka Nnamani (instructed by OJN Solicitors) appeared on behalf of the Appellant. Ms Julie Anderson (instructed by the Treasury Solicitors) appeared on behalf of the Respondent. ____________________
(ii) The decision of the ECJ in MRAX (Free Movement of Persons) [2002] ECR 1-5691 (ECJ C-459/99) could be distinguished because:
(iii) Applying the decision in Kugathas v SSHD [2003] EWCA Civ 31 , the appellant as an adult male had not established that there would be a breach of his rights under Article 8 to respect for his family life because he had not shown any ties with his mother and stepfather beyond the emotional ties which normally exist between adult relatives (paragraph 19).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.