Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The decision of the tribunal is that the claimant is not a disabled person for the purposes of the Disability�Discrimination Act 1995. His claim in that regard must therefore fail.
The claimant was represented by Mr M Potter, Barrister-at-Law, instructed by Thompsons�McClure, Solicitors.
The respondents were represented by Ms L Toolan, of the Engineering Employers' Federation.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.