Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL Royal Courts of Justice Strand London, WC2A 2LL Friday, 9 June 2017 At the Tribunal On 11 September 2017 Before
Held: dismissing the appeal . The ET had permissibly considered the application to amend was to include a new cause of action. It had then gone on to determine whether the application should be allowed, having regard to the guidance laid down in Selkent Bus Co Ltd v Moore [1996] IRLR 661 . Doing so, the ET had regard to that which was relevant and not to any irrelevant matter. It had concluded that the balance of prejudice meant the application should be refused. The Claimant had not met the high test to show that was a perverse conclusion.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.