Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
             In a decision promulgated on 6 August 2024 I set aside the decision of a judge of the First-tier Tribunal so far as they related to the refusal of the appellant's application for international protection on Artcile 3 ECHR grounds only.
             The section of the determination which allowed the Appellant's appeal on Article 8 ECHR grounds, relied upon as an exception to his deportation from the United Kingdom, is a preserved finding.
             Directions were given for the matter to come back before the Upper Tribunal to enable it to determine whether the appellant will face a real risk, if returned to Jamaica, of ill-treatment pursuant to Article 3 ECHR.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.