Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify him. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court.
             The appellant appeals with permission against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Row dismissing his protection and human rights claims.
             An anonymity order was made by the First-tier Tribunal. I have considered Guidance Note 2022 No.2: Anonymity Orders and Hearings in Private and I am satisfied that it is appropriate to make such an order because t he appellant has made an application for international protection. I consider that the UK's obligations towards applicants for international protection and the need to protect the confidentiality of the asylum process outweigh the public interest in open justice in this case.
             The appellant entered the UK in August 2021 and claimed asylum. On 23 March 2023, the respondent interviewed him about his asylum claim and in a decision dated 17 May 2023, she refused it.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.