Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
REASONS FOR FINDING THAT TRIBUNAL MADE AN ERROR OF LAW, SUCH THAT ITS DECISION FALLS TO BE SET ASIDE
Subsequently supplemented by procedural directions, permission to appeal was granted by Judge Andrew on 2 December 2014 in the following terms:
�1. The Appellant seeks permission to appeal, in time, against a decision of the First-tier Tribunal (Judge Gurung-Thapa) promulgated on 25 th September 2014 whereby it dismissed the Appellant�s appeal against the Secretary of State�s decision to refuse to grant entry clearance.
It is arguable that because of the identified difficulties with the interpreter the Judge should have asked for a de novo hearing of this appeal.
The Sponsor attended the error of law hearing, which took the form of submissions. I have taken these into account, together with the grounds of appeal and the supplementary statement, of which paragraphs 2 to 6 are in point, of the Sponsor. At the end of the hearing I stated my decision.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.