Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
LORD JUSTICE RUSSELL LORD JUSTICE EDMUND DAVIES and LORD JUSTICE CAIRNS ____________________
(Transcript of the Shorthand Notes of the Association of Official Shorthandwriters Ltd., Room 392, Royal Courts of Justice and 2, New Square, Lincoln's Inn, London, W.C.2.)
MR. GODFREY HEILPERN, Q.C. and MR. A. LOGAN PETCH (instructed by Mr. Harry Smith, Manchester) appeared on behalf of the Appellant. MISS ROSE HEILBRON. Q.C. and MR. GERALD CROWE (instructed by Mr. W.H. Thompson, Manchester) appeared on behalf of the Respondent. ____________________
LORD JUSTICE RUSSELL : I will ask Lord Justice Edmund Davies to give the judgment of the Court.
The Plaintiff's own attitude in relation to the wearing of crash helmets is the second ground relied upon as supporting the allegation of contributory negligence. I quote from his cross-examination:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.