Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
LORD JUSTICE TOULSON MR JUSTICE ROYCE MRS JUSTICE SWIFT DBE ____________________
Computer Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of WordWave International Limited A Merrill Communications Company 165 Fleet Street London EC4A 2DY Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838 (Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
Mr J Lyons appeared on behalf of the Appellant Mr S Rose appeared on behalf of the Crown ____________________
These findings suggested that there had been heavy friction from an erect penis going over the genitalia and the notch to the hymen indicated either partial penetration with a penis or digital penetration. The injuries to the anus suggested penetration either by a penis or fingers or a blunt instrument. Viewed in isolation the anal injuries could have been caused by constipation but Dr Kugan questioned M's parents whether there had been constipation and was told that there had not. She also tested for constipation by feeling M's abdomen.
No objection was taken to the suggestive (ie leading) nature of the question, no doubt because by then it would have been too late, and the witness agreed. She said:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.