Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Ms Randhawa for the Local Authority Mr Todd for the proposed adopters Ms Ward for the paternal grandparents Mr Ainsley for the Children's Guardian ____________________
As I said to Mr Todd after delivery of the Judgment, I have of course had regard to the various Art 8 rights to respect for private life which are engaged here, but I do not find in practice in cases like this that they add anything in reality to the statutory welfare test.]
NB: NOW SEE THE COURT OF APPEAL'S DECISION IN RE W (A CHILD) [2016] EWCA Civ 793 .
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.