Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The unanimous decision of the tribunal is that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed by the respondent and the claimant�s claim is therefore dismissed.
The respondent was represented by Ms R Connolly, Solicitor, of Rosemary Connolly, Solicitors.
1.2���� It was not disputed that the claimant was employed by the respondent, Dominick Healy & Sons Ltd, and that in or about September 2012 , Sean Healy and Thomas Healy, who also traded and continued to trade as Healy Brothers, Funeral Directors, took over and became the owners of Dominick Healy & Sons Ltd on the death of their father, Dominick Healy.
2.1 The tribunal heard oral evidence given by the claimant and also, on his behalf, by Stephen Connolly.� The tribunal heard oral evidence, on behalf of the respondent, given by Mrs Jeanette Doyle, Ms Colette Healy, Ms Eileen Healy, Mr Sean Healy and Mr Thomas Healy.
Having considered the evidence given to the tribunal by the parties and their witnesses, as referred to above, the documents in the trial bundles �as amended� to which the tribunal was referred during the course of the hearing, together with the oral submissions by the representatives of the claimant and the respondent, the tribunal made the following findings of fact, as set out in the following������������������������������ sub-paragraphs, insofar as necessary and relevant for the determination of the claimant�s claim.�
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.