Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
A meeting accordingly was held, (13th June 1831,) and as the parties then differed in opinion, it was agreed that each should submit a draft of a lease to the referees, and be heard before them, as to the terms and conditions of the lease, previous to its final adjustment.
Each party accordingly lodged with the referees a draft of the proposed lease, and the referees, (30th March 1832,) after various meetings with the parties, adjusted the draft of a lease, which was communicated to the parties. Considerable discussion, both orally and in writing, followed; the terms of the lease were finally settled by the referees, 28th November 1832, and the defender declared his acceptance thereof by letter, 21st December following.
Thereafter the decree-arbitral was delivered to the pursuer, Mr Jolly, by the clerk to the referees, who, at the same time, gave in an account of the sums alleged to be due to the referees, and to himself as their clerk, amounting to L.84: 4: 11.
The Lord Ordinary ‘found the pursuer entitled to one half of the expenses of the arbitration, subsequent to the 13th day of June 1831, as paid to the arbiters and their clerks, with interest from the date of payment as libelled; and found expenses due,’ &c.
Lord Corehouse, Ordinary. Act. Rutherfurd. And. Clason, W.S. Agent. Alt. Dean of Fac. (Hope,) Turnbull. Wotherspoon & Mack, W.S. Agents. D. Clerk.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.