Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr Gordon Nardell QC and Mr James Burton (instructed by Eversheds LLP) for the Claimant Mr Richard Harwood QC (instructed by Richard Buxton) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 28 February 2013 ____________________
(ii) the manner in which "local development documents" are prepared and may be adopted or approved
(iii) which documents are "development plan documents" and which are "supplementary planning documents"
"''supplementary planning document" means any document of a description referred to in regulation 5 (except an adopted policies map or a statement of community involvement) which is not a local plan ", (emphasis added)
POLICIES FOR WIND TURBINES IN THE ADOPTED LOCAL PLAN AND THE "EMERGING POLICY" IN THE WIND SPD
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.