Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
       In a determination promulgated on 30 March 2022 First-tier Tribunal Judge Groom ('the Judge') allowed the appeal of the above appellant, a citizen of Albania born on 28 October 1999, against the refusal of his application made under the EU Settlement Scheme.
       The Judge accepted the Appellant and his partner, the EU national, met on 4 January 2020 and that he proposed marriage to her on 10 October 2020. The Judge notes at [15] the Appellant and his partner married on 19 May 2021.
       The Judge accepts that the marriage took place after the specified date of 11 PM 31 December 2020 and after the deadline for EUSS applications of 30 June 2021 ('the grace period').
       The Judge at [20] found the Appellant became a family member of an EEA national after the specified date as a direct result of the impact of the COVID 19 pandemic which was beyond his control and that the decision refusing the application was not proportionate to the individual circumstances of the Appellant taking into account the impact of such a decision has on his spouse.
       The Secretary of State sought permission to appeal which was granted by another judge of the First-tier Tribunal on the basic it was arguable the Judge had materially erred in the interpretation of Article 10 of the Withdrawal Agreement in the context of the Appellant's circumstances at the 'specified date' and in his approach to the 'grace period'.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.