Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the appellant: Mr M Symes and Ms A Nizami, instructed by Duncan Lewis Solicitors
(1) When the Upper Tribunal grants permission to appeal from the First-tier Tribunal, even on limited grounds, its decision is not amenable to judicial review under the Cart procedure, which, as specifically indicated by CPR 54.7A, is available only when the Upper Tribunal refuses permission.
(2) Rule 22(2)(b) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 has the effect that in the absence of any direction limiting the grounds which may be argued before the Upper Tribunal, the grounds contained in the application for permission are the grounds of appeal to the Upper Tribunal, even if permission is stated to have been granted on limited grounds.
(3) Rule 22(2)(b) has the complementary effect that any limitation on the grounds of appeal must be by direction and, as a direction, can be the subject of an application to amend, suspend or set aside that direction under rule 5(2) of the 2008 Rules.
On 4 February 2020, following a hearing the previous month, the First-tier Tribunal promulgated a decision, dismissing the appellant's appeal on asylum and human rights grounds. He sought permission to appeal on seven grounds. On 3 March 2020, the First-tier Tribunal refused permission to appeal. The appellant then renewed his application to the Upper Tribunal, on each of the seven grounds.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.