Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
I have considered whether any parties require the protection of an anonymity direction. No anonymity direction was made previously in respect of this Appellant. Having considered all the circumstances and evidence I do not deem it necessary to make an anonymity direction.
The Secretary of State for the Home Department brings this appeal but in order to avoid confusion the parties are referred to as they were in the First-tier Tribunal. This is an appeal by the Secretary of State against a decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Tiffen, promulgated on 1 May 2014 which allowed the Appellant�s appeal against a refusal of entry clearance as a spouse under Appendix FM of the Immigration Rules.
The Appellant was born on 5 February 1987 and is a citizen of China and is the wife of Zhao Haiyang who is a British citizen.
On 1 July 2013 the Secretary of State refused the Appellant�s application under Appendix FM of the Rules. The refusal was on the basis that there was a discrepancy between the payslips in respect of his employment and the deposits into the sponsors bank account from his employment and there was not explanation for the difference. Therefore the Respondent concluded that he could not be satisfied that the sponsor provided the specified documents or that he earned the money claimed.
Grounds of appeal were lodged and on 13 June 2014 First-tier Tribunal Judge Holmes gave permission to appeal.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.