Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL 58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS At the Tribunal On 17 March 2000 Before
JUDGE PETER CLARK : Following delivery of our judgment in this case, Ms Crasnow applies on behalf of the applicant for the costs in this appeal limited to �500. She submits that in accordance with Rule 34(1) of the EAT Rules the appellant's conduct in bringing this appeal was unreasonable and that accordingly an order should be made.
We have no hesitation in upholding that application. This was a hopeless appeal and the appellant should pay the sum of �500 costs to the applicant. There is no costs order in respect of the remaining respondents below.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.