Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
By way of a letter to the Upper Tribunal dated 1 August 2014 the appellant�s representatives requested withdrawal of the appellant�s appeal before the Upper Tribunal.
Consent of the Upper Tribunal is required for a party to withdraw its case. Having carefully considered the facts of this appeal as a whole, I give consent to the appellant to withdraw his case.
Accordingly with my consent, and pursuant to rule 17(5) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, this appeal is recorded as �Withdrawn with the consent of the Upper Tribunal�. This is a Notice pursuant to rule 17(5) to inform the parties that the appellant�s case is withdrawn.
The effect of the appellant�s case being withdrawn from the Upper Tribunal is that the proceedings before the Upper Tribunal are at an end. There is no appeal before the Upper Tribunal and the First-tier Tribunal�s decision shall stand.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.