Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr C Hale QC (instructed by Dawson Cornwall) for the Appellant Mother Mr J Tod (instructed by Malcolm C Foy & Co) for the Respondent Father Hearing dates: 4 May 2022 ____________________
Accordingly, the parties have agreed a financial package which in my judgment generously meets C's housing need, his educational costs, maintenance including a carer's allowance, with the additional benefit of a replacement car every four years.
It might be thought that a package of this nature would satisfy all claims that could be made on behalf of a child who is not yet two years old .
In fact, there are five issues between the parties, of which the first two are both the most significant in financial terms, and which turn on the application of issues of principle, namely:
(1) Should the Father clear all of the Mother's liabilities, however they may have arisen, because it is in the best interests of C that his mother should at the conclusion of this case be debt free? and
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.