Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
We grant the applications for judicial review made by each of the five applicants.� The Upper Tribunals� ORDERS are:
(i) in JR/1707/2011 (Barrett), to QUASH the decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber) (Criminal Injuries Compensation) (�FtT�) dated 30 November 2009, 26 October 2010,� 26 November 2010 and 24 February 2011, and to REMIT Ms Barrett�s appeal to a differently constituted FtT for it to assess loss of earnings compensation;
(ii) in JR/2196/2012 (Groom), to QUASH the decisions of the FtT dated 1 November 2011, 22 March 2012 and that part of its decision of 2 June 2010 adjourning to itself the determination of compensation, and REMIT the eligibility decision made by the FtT on 2 June 2010 to CICA for implementation and further decision;
(iii) in JR/539/2012 (Parke), to QUASH the decisions of the FtT dated 27 July 2011, 6 September 2011 and that part of its decision of 6 January 2010 adjourning to itself the determination of compensation, and REMIT the eligibility decision made by the FtT on 6 January 2010 to CICA for implementation and further decision;
(iv) in JR/595/2012 (Ibrar), to QUASH the decision of the FtT dated 27 October 2011 and that part of its decision of 24 March 2011 adjourning to itself the determination of compensation, and REMIT the eligibility decision made by the FtT on 24 March 2011 to CICA for implementation and further decision; and
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.