Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the Appellant (PD) is granted anonymity. No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the Appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the Appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
             Before turning to re-make the decision, I confirm what is not in dispute as follows:
(1) The Appellant is not excluded from the protection of the Refugee Convention by section 72 Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. Accordingly, if the Refugee Convention applies to his case, then he is entitled to recognition as a refugee notwithstanding his criminal convictions.
(3) However, the Appellant has not challenged Judge Devlin's findings that the Appellant is not at risk on return as a failed asylum seeker nor on account of any political opinion or imputed political opinion. He would not face any real risk from the Zimbabwean State.
(4) The Appellant has not challenged Judge Devlin's findings that JM has no involvement in Zimbabwean politics or any connection with the Zimbabwean authorities.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.