Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
            The Appellant appeals against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Mulready promulgated on 22 April 2024 ("the Decision") dismissing the Appellant's appeal against the Respondent's decision dated 10 July 2020 refusing his protection and human rights claims made in the context of a decision to deport the Appellant to India.
            The appeal against the Respondent's decision was initially allowed by First-tier Tribunal Judge S J Clarke by a decision promulgated on 17 May 2022 ("the First Appeal Decision"). However, by a decision issued on 16 March 2023, this Tribunal (The Honourable Mrs Justice Thornton and Upper Tribunal Judge Rimington) found an error of law in the First Appeal Decision and remitted the appeal to the First-tier Tribunal for re-determination.
            Following remittal, Judge Mulready dismissed the Article 3 medical claim, finding that the Appellant would be able to obtain treatment for his condition in India. That treatment would be available and accessible to him.
            The Appellant appeals the Decision on six grounds as follows:
Ground one: the Judge failed to give the appeal anxious scrutiny. This ground depends on and overlaps with grounds two to four.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.