Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
MR J BARRETT (instructed by Birkett's LLP) appeared on behalf of the Claimant. MR A SUTERWALLA (instructed by Capsticks LLP) appeared on behalf of the Defendant. ____________________
(i) Furthermore, and as I prefigured earlier in this judgment, the defendant expresses concern that the claimant misstates the effect of the judgment of Smith J in Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust v Lancashire County Council � [2018] EWHC 1589 (TCC) . That was a case which was dealing with the defendant's duty to give reasons and to justify its case at trial, not the prior question as to whether an award letter is adequate.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.