Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, [the appellant] ( and/or any member of his family, expert, witness or other person the Tribunal considers should not be identified ) is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant ( and/or other person ). Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
              The Appellant, a citizen of Nigeria, appeals against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Mathews dismissing his protection and human rights appeal promulgated on 14 th April 2023. The Appellant applied for permission to appeal which was granted by First-tier Tribunal Judge Adio in the following terms:
              At the outset of the hearing, we verified with Mr Walker, who confirmed that the Respondent has not served a Rule 24 response.
              Having heard Mr Wood's submissions outlining the grounds of appeal, Mr Walker conceded that the decision contained material errors of law as identified by Mr Wood. We are inclined to agree and do so for the following reasons.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.