Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Both representatives agreed that as at the relevant date the claimant did not meet the financial requirements as set out in the Immigration Rules and that on the basis of current jurisprudence the claim could not succeed on Article 8 grounds.
Accordingly I allow the appeal of the ECO, thus dismissing the claimant�s appeal against the decision to refuse him entry clearance.
For the avoidance of doubt I reiterate that the claimant�s successful appeal against the refusal under paragraph 320(11) stands.
The making of the decision of the First-tier Tribunal did involve the making of an error on a point of law.
I set aside the decision and dismiss the claimant�s appeal against the decision by the ECO.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.