Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The application was also refused on the grounds that the appellant did not satisfy the financial requirements under the Rules, and nor did he satisfy the English language requirement.
The appellant appealed against this decision and his appeal was heard before First-tier Tribunal Judge Whiting sitting at Columbus House, Newport on 1 October 2013.
In a determination promulgated on 8 October 2013, Judge Whiting dismissed the appellant�s appeal, both under the Immigration Rules, and also under Article 8.
The appellant appealed against this decision and was granted leave by First-tier Tribunal Judge Frances on 27 November 2013.
I heard submissions on behalf of both parties, which are set out in my Record of Proceedings, in which I attempted to record everything which was said to me. Accordingly, I shall not set out below everything which was said to me during the course of the hearing, but shall refer only to such of the submissions as is necessary for the purposes of this determination. However, I have had regard to everything which was said during the course of the hearing, as well as to all the documents contained within the files, whether or not the same is referred to specifically below.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.