Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant and/or any member of his family, expert, or witness is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant (and/or other person). Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
              I sat with Upper Tribunal Judge Macleman on 29 February 2024 where we found an error of law in this case. Put very shortly, at paragraph 13 of my judgment I said the following:
"13. Presented to us today is a case where the appellant says he is a Syrian national and has presented Syrian nationality documents. It seems that at least part of these may be genuine documents, but the Secretary of State has not given any reason why they were rejected. The Secretary of State will have to give proper reasons as to why these documents are rejected and why they do not accept his nationality."
              Unfortunately today, which is 16 September 2024, we are in no clearer position as to the Secretary of State's position on those documents other than that they are said to be genuine documents.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.