Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Respondent: Ms A Walker, Counsel instructed by Jein Solicitors, Lewisham, London
The Respondent, Mr Rivzi, is a citizen of Sri Lanka whose date of birth is recorded as 18 th October 1995. On or about 15 th June 2015 application was made on behalf of the Respondent for him to join his mother in the United Kingdom having regard to paragraph 197 of the Immigration Rules.
Not content with that decision, by Notice dated 4 th December 2014 the Secretary of State made application for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal. She relied on Section 325(1) of the Housing Act 1985 contending that it was not open to the judge to find that accommodation was adequate were the Sponsor and Mr Rizvi to share, given that the statute provides:
�The room standard is contravened when the number of persons sleeping in a dwelling and the number of rooms available as sleeping accommodation is such that two persons of opposite sexes who are not living together as husband and wife must sleep in the same room.�
As to the sole responsibility issue there was, it was contended, inadequate reasoning.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.