Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The first respondent, who was born in 1957, is the mother, and the second respondent, aged 25 years, is the father, of M, a daughter who was born on 13 January 1998.
The first respondent has had four children. The first child, LG, is no longer alive. The second, LW, is subject to a supervision requirement to live with her maternal grandmother. The second respondent is the father of the third (M) and fourth child (B), both of whom live with foster parents. B was born on 8 July 1999.
M did not put on weight appropriately, there being variable weight gain between 24 February and 31 March 1998. While in hospital between 31 March and 4 April, M gained weight. But, after being returned to her parents, M gained no weight between 4 and 14 April and grew only three centimetres.
The second respondent was violent towards the first respondent on 27 January 1998.
The second respondent agreed to register with a doctor so that he could be referred to a psychiatrist to tackle the question of his violence. He did not do so.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.