Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The claimant is assessed by the tribunal to have been 50% responsible for his dismissal.
The claimant was represented by Mr R McCaughey, Barrister-at-Law, instructed by Aidan Quinn Solicitors.
(i) whether or not the claimant was unfairly dismissed contrary to Article 126 of the Employment rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996, as amended, to include whether or not the claimant's complaint was in time;
(ii) whether or not the claimant is entitled to redundancy pay as per part XII of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996; and
(iii) whether or not the claimant is entitled to notice pay as per Articles 118-119 of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.