Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Subject_1 Property Subject_2 Foreshore Subject_3 Right of Ware Subject_4 Boundaries — Bay. Facts: Held that the principle to be applied in fixing the boundaries of two adjacent properties situated on a bay, with reference to the exercise of the right of sea-ware on the foreshore, is to take an average line of coast, and drop a perpendicular upon it from the termination of the land march between the properties.
The Court accordingly remitted, before further answer, to Mr Keith Johnston, to lay down a line representing the average direction of the coast, and a perpendicular drawn to it from the termination of the land march between the properties, with leave to the parties to ask Mr Johnston to lay down such other lines as should tend to elucidate the questions at issue.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.