Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr Nicholas Peacock (instructed by Speechly Bircham) for the Claimant Mr Christopher Pymont QC (instructed by Walker Morris) for the First Defendants Hearing dates: 6, 7, 8, 9 & 19 June 2006 ____________________
This stance was borne out by Mr Lafayeedney's lengthy witness statement, which denied any agreement between the parties, and made no concession that the Claimant was entitled to anything other than the return of the �350,000.
a) whether the document sent out by Mr Lafayeedney on 19 April 2004 recorded an agreement previously reached between the parties ( Section C2 below);
b) whether there was a unilateral contract between the parties in April/May 2004 ( Section C3 below);
c) whether the Claimant's acceptance of the 19 April 2004 document was communicated to the Defendants ( Section C4 below);
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.