Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
HAVING considered all documents lodged and having heard Mr L Johnson, instructed by Instalaw Solicitors, for the Applicant initially, following which the Applicant was not legally represented, and Mr A Lane, instructed by the Respondent at hearings on 26 th , 27 th April and handed down on 7 th July 2022
(1)     The application for judicial review is refused, for the reasons in the attached judgment.
(2)     This Tribunal makes a declaration that the Applicant was, at the time of the Respondent's assessment of him, and is, an adult, with an allocated date of birth of 12 th June 1998.
(4)     The Applicant has failed in his primary aim in applying for judicial review, specifically a declaration of his allocated date of birth as minor, at the date of the Respondent's assessment. The Applicant shall pay the Respondent's reasonable costs, to be assessed, of not agreed, in accordance with the Civil Legal Aid (Costs) Regulations 2013 and CPR 47.18. No costs award shall be enforced without the permission of the court.
(5)     No application has been made for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal. In any event, permission to appeal is refused because the decision does not disclose any arguable error of law.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.