Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to Rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, I make an anonymity order. Unless the Upper Tribunal or a Court directs otherwise, no report of these proceedings or any form of publication thereof shall directly or indirectly identify the Appellant or members of his family. This direction applies to, amongst others, all parties. Any failure to comply with this direction could give rise to contempt of court proceedings. I make this order because the Appellant seeks international protection and is therefore entitled to privacy.
              This is an appeal against a decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Hena ("the Judge"), promulgated on 5 September 2023. By that decision, the Judge dismissed the Appellant's appeal against the decision of the Secretary of State to refuse his protection and human rights claim.
             At the conclusion of the error of law hearing, I found that the Judge had made a material error of law. I now set out my reasons.
             In summary, the Judge dismissed the appeal for the following reasons:
(1)     The evidence did not demonstrate that there are any particular factors relating to the Appellant or his sur place activities such that there will be a real risk of persecution on return [29].
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.