Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The respondent was represented by Mr Colm Hagan, Barrister-at-Law, instructed by Faloon and Toal, Solicitors.
The decision of the tribunal is that the claimant's claims for unfair dismissal, right to receive particulars of contract and right to receive an itemised pay statement are out of time in circumstances where it was reasonably practicable for them to be presented in time.
Whether the claims for unfair dismissal, Right to Receive Particulars of Contract and Right to Receive an Itemised Pay Statement have been presented in time and, if not was it reasonably practicable for the claims to be presented within the time limits laid down in the Employment Rights (NI) Order 1996.
Having considered the originating claim, the evidence of the claimant and letters handed in by the parties, the tribunal makes the following findings of fact:-
Article 145(2) of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996 provides that an industrial tribunal shall not consider a complaint [of unfair dismissal] unless it is presented to the tribunal �
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.