Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This is an appeal by the Secretary of State against a decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Creswell promulgated on 12 November 2013 whereby the judge allowed Mr Prabhdeep Singh�s appeal against the Secretary of State�s decision to refuse his application for leave to remain in the United Kingdom as a Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) under paragraph 245DD of HC 395 (as amended).
The grounds of the application asserted that the First-tier Tribunal found that the appellant succeeded on Article 8 but (a) failed to deal with the Gulshan test and (b) failed to make any findings of fact whatsoever as regards Mr Singh�s private life.
The matter came before Upper Tribunal Judge Hanson, who set aside the First-tier Tribunal Judge�s judgment and gave further directions as to the conduct of this matter which included further submissions to be made by both sides.
Mr Turner, who appears for Mr Singh but did not appear below, put in written submissions dated 31 March which surprisingly, as Mr Avery pointed out in his written submissions of even date, referred to the wrong Rules. The relevant Rules which were the subject matter of the appeal are those helpfully appended to Mr Avery�s submissions namely those in force between 6 April 2013 and 30 April 2013. These read as follows:
(a) The specified documents to show evidence of money available to invest are one or more of the following specified documents:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.