Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellant: Mr A Jafar, Counsel, instructed by the Lee Valley, solicitors.
The Appellant is a male citizen of Pakistan, whose date of birth is 8 March 1980. His appeal against the decision of the Respondent to refuse his application for leave to remain as the victim of domestic violence was refused by the Respondent under paragraphs 289 of HC 395, as amended (the Immigration Rules). A decision was also made to curtail his existing leave under paragraph 322(1A) and to remove him to Pakistan. His appeal against those decisions was dismissed by Designated First-tier Tribunal Judge Coates (the Judge) in a determination promulgated on 27 February 2014.
The Respondent provided copies of the documentary evidence relied on to establish that the document obtained from Hunters Moor as to the treatment received by the Appellant for depression was a forged document. The Appellant provided no additional evidence.
The facts, briefly, are that the Appellant claimed to have suffered from depression as a result of domestic violence and to corroborate his account that he had received treatment for depression he provided to the Respondent a compliment slip from Hunters Moor Neurorehabilitation Centre for the West Midlands (Hunters Moor). On the face of the compliment slip, it is stated (inaccuracies as in the original):
�To inform that (the Appellant) attends sessions at our unit for his depression sessions. For any concerns, contact for enquiris.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.