Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The ECM reviewed the refusal in the light of the grounds of appeal, and evidence filed in support, on 12 March 2014. He maintained the overall decision to refuse the application, and each of the bases upon which that had been reached.
The appeal was heard by First Tier Tribunal Judge Cohen at Taylor House on 2 October 2014, and in a Decision promulgated on 21 October 2014 it was allowed under the Immigration Rules.
By a decision of First Tier Tribunal Judge Saffer of 13 January 2015 the Appellant was granted permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal on the basis it was arguable the Judge had fallen into error, if, as the Appellant asserted, he had told the parties at the hearing that he intended to dismiss the appeal.
The Respondent filed no Rule 24 Notice. Neither party has applied for permission to rely upon further evidence pursuant to Rule 15(2A) of the Upper Tribunal Procedure Rules 2008.
When the appeal was called on for hearing neither the sponsor, nor any other representative for the Respondent was present. No application for an adjournment had been received on the Respondent�s behalf, and no explanation offered for the failure to attend.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.