Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Appellant appeals against a determination of Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Kelly promulgated on 13 th May 2014.
The Appellant is a male citizen of India, born 4 th February 1988 who applied for leave to remain in the United Kingdom as a Tier 4 (General) Student Migrant under the points-based system.
The application was refused on 20 th January 2014 with reference to paragraph 245ZX(d) and paragraph 1A(c) of Appendix C of the Immigration Rules.
The Respondent did not accept that the Appellant was entitled to be awarded the 10 points he had claimed in relation to maintenance. The Appellant was required to show that he was in possession of �1,600 for a consecutive 28 day period. The closing date of the entries in the Appellant�s bankbook that he had submitted in support of his application was 5 th December 2013. The Respondent contended that he therefore needed to show evidence of �1,600 being available for 28 days from 8 th November 2013 to 5 th December 2013.
The Respondent pointed out that the Appellant�s bankbook showed that he had been in possession of no more than 60,914.89 rupees (�598) between 8 th November and 18 th November 2013 and therefore he had not demonstrated that he held the level of funds required for the 28 day period.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.