Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The summary of her claim is that she was born and brought up in the Philippines. At the age of 19 she gave birth to her son out of wedlock. She was in an abusive relationship with the father of her son and they separated soon after the birth. The Appellant went to live with her grandmother.
The family she was working for in Hong Kong did not treat her well but she felt she had no alternative but to work for them.
In 2007 she came with the family to the UK. She continued to be badly treated. She was not paid and was not fed properly. She was locked in the house when the family went out.
After a while she managed to escape. She met other Filipinos who said they would help her. She was taken to a coffee shop where she was again mistreated and sexually abused. She was made to sleep on the floor. She remained at the coffee shop for about a year and a half.
In 2009 she managed to escape and went to a church. There she met someone who introduced her to Mrs Alhaidary and her family who agreed to accommodate and maintain her. She has been with them ever since. She would be unable to integrate into the Philippines now due to her lack of family support there. Also, she has mental health problems. Further, her removal would amount to a disproportionate interference with the family life she enjoys with the Alhaidary family.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.