Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
             The Appellant is a national of Sudan. She applied for entry clearance to join her claimed spouse in the UK on the basis of refugee reunion under paragraph 352 A of the Immigration Rules on 28 June 2021. The application was refused on 16 September 2021 and her appeal against the Respondent's decision was dismissed by First-tier Tribunal Judge Boyes in a decision uploaded on 20 January 2023.
             Permission to appeal was granted on all grounds by Upper Tribunal Judge Sheridan on 18 May 2023.
             The matter came before me to determine whether the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) had erred in law, and if so whether any such error was material such that the decision should be set aside.
             There was no Response. Miss Rushforth maintained that the decision contained no error of law for the reasons below.
             Mr Forbes relied on his grounds of appeal and said that the exculpatory evidence advanced by the Appellant should have been considered in relation to the allegation of deception and the principle in Naidu applied as it was a wider public law issue. He submitted that the Judge should have made a thorough assessment under paragraph 352A of the Immigration Rules and should have taken account of the evidence postdating the refusal.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.