Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Argued for the petitioners—The company being a purely family concern, the proposed reduction being fair and equitable, and no question of public interest being involved, the Court might dispense with intimation and advertisement. In the case of the British and Burmese Steam Navigation Company, Limited , December 10, 1879, 7 R. 379 , the Court had granted a similar petition Page: 65 ↓
The Court (the Lord President , Lord Johnston , and Lord Skerrington ) appointed intimation and advertisement in the usual form.
Counsel for the Petitioners— Gentles . Agent— John S. Morton , W.S.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.