Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The decision of the tribunal is that the claimant is awarded costs in the sum of �1,216.00 by way of a Preparation Time Order.
The respondent was represented by Mr C Hamill, Barrister-at-Law, instructed by the Directorate of Legal Services.
1.������ By a decision of this tribunal issued on 25 November 2014 the claimant was successful in a claim of discrimination on grounds of religious belief and/or political opinion and was awarded the sum of �9,900.00 compensation.
2.������ The claimant sought a Preparation Time Order to cover preparation time of 125 hours.� In his letter of 8 December 2014 requesting the Order the claimant alleged that the respondent�s defence was misconceived. �In that letter the claimant homed in on the respondent�s defence of the Working Well Together (WWT) investigation, report, and review.
I refer to the above case and the Tribunal�s decision of 25 November 2014 (as Attached).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.