Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Computer-aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of Smith Bernal Reporting Limited 190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AG Telephone No: 0171-421 4040/0171-404 1400 Fax No: 0171-831 8838 Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
MR P BOWEN (instructed by BINDMAN & PARTNERS, LONDON WC1X 8QB) appeared on behalf of the Claimant. MR R CLAYTON QC (instructed by HEMPSONS SOLICITORS, PORTLAND ST, MANCHESTER, M1 3LF) appeared on behalf of the first Defendant. MISS J RICHARDS (instructed by THE TREASURY SOLICITOR, LONDON SW1H 9AT) appeared on behalf of the second Defendant. THE THIRD DEFENDANT DID NOT ATTEND AND WAS NOT REPRESENTED ____________________
(3) The Amendments sought against the Hospital in relation to an alleged duty to pass further information to the Home Secretary.
MR BOWEN: My Lord, thank you for the effort you plainly put into that decision. But may I apply for permission to appeal?
MR BOWEN: My Lord, the grounds that were assessed by you, or rather that you considered, that the appeal has a real prospect of success.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.