Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellant, Nosa Idemudia, was born on 5 December 1994 and is a male citizen of Nigeria. The appellant had appealed to the First-tier Tribunal against the decision of the respondent dated 21 February 2013 to refuse him entry clearance to the United Kingdom as a visitor. The United Kingdom sponsor is the appellant�s mother, Harriet Egberanmwen Uyikpen (hereafter referred to as the sponsor). The First-tier Tribunal (Judge Shimmin) in a determination promulgated on 21 November 2013 dismissed the appeal.
The appellant�s application was refused under paragraph 41(i), (ii), (vi) and (vii):
The requirements to be met by a person seeking leave to enter the United Kingdom as a general visitor are that he:
(i) is genuinely seeking entry as a general visitor for a limited period as stated by him, not exceeding 6 months or not exceeding 12 months in the case of a person seeking entry to accompany an academic visitor, provided in the latter case the visitor accompanying the academic visitor has entry clearance; and
(ii) intends to leave the United Kingdom at the end of the period of the visit as stated by him; and does not intend to live for extended periods in the United Kingdom through frequent or successive visits; and
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.