Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
"Subject to the terms and conditions of this agreement BCT shall perform such services and carry out such work ('Services') for the Client as are expressly agreed in writing between BCT and the Client. Each Service performed shall be deemed to be performed or carried out under a separate contract."
It appears that following the conclusion of the Client Service Agreement BCT provided a Detailed Design Report dated 21 April 1999 (No. 6/3 of process) which was then followed by a proposal regarding a Management Information Service ("MIS") dated 24 May 1999, that being in turn succeeded by the Specialisation Letter dated 19 June 1999 (No. 6/6 of process). The services to be performed by BCT are set out in paragraph 2 of the letter which contains eight sub-paragraphs. Sub-paragraphs (1) and (2) of that paragraph are in these terms:
"2.1 BCT will document the functional specification for a new Management Information System (WMIS) to the requirements as agreed by the steering group and broadly in line with the Detailed Design Report.
2.2 BCT will develop the Management Information system to the agreed specifications."
"The Defenders failed to deliver a Management Information System which was broadly in line with the Detailed Design Report. The Defenders are in breach of contract."
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.